Well, for the record, I can present you with a LOT more evidence that OJ DIDN'T kill Nicole and Ron than you can show me that he DID.
Innocent? No. Not at all. The overwhelming evidence points to his son having committed the crime, and that means OJ is guilty of aiding and abetting, since he knows about it.
Stop and look at the trial and replace OJ with his son as the suspect:
Defense: OJ couldn't have jumped that wall that the limo driver saw the black man running across the backyard went over.
Fact: His son, who is about the same height and build so could easily be mistaken for him, doesn't have rheumatoid arthritis and so could easily have vaulted that wall. After killing two people, who else would he run to? Dad.
Defense: The DNA is close but not an exact match.
Fact: His son would not be an exact match in DNA but would be close.
Defense: The murder weapon was never found, OJ doesn't have it. He went to Chicago on a plane and didn't have time to dispose of the knife.
Fact: Considering his son had been fired recently from a restaurant for threatening the manager with a knife... and then had been heard making a statement to some friends (after Nicole made his father stand in the back of an auditorium for their daughter's recital when he arrived late instead of allowing him to sit) that if anyone ever hurt his dad again he'd kill them... this guy had plenty of motive AND had the opportunity to dispose of the weapon since no one was watching him.
Defense: The gloves don't fit OJ
Fact: No one tried them on the kid, now, did they?
All of this notwithstanding... I think OJ is a creep. Why? Well, he definitely knows who did it and isn't interested in seeing justice done. Writing that book supports the evidence that his son did it. How? Well, simple. He can't be tried again for the crime but his son has no such protection. Someone wrote a book detailing the evidence against the son and soon after, OJ writes this book. Can you say "misdirection"? That is exactly what that was. His demeanour in this trial supports the evidence that his son did it, too... because he was a lot calmer during the murder trial than during this one. He's even said he trusts the jury system... and he knew he didn't do the murder... he knows he DID this.
So to come BACK to the question... there IS a double-murderer on the streets and he's not even being looked at as a suspect because they were SOOO sure it was OJ that they planted evidence to seal their case... and then blew it.