Question:
O.J. Simpson. (sp?)?
Megan
2007-11-16 08:17:43 UTC
Doesn't anyone else get that weird feeling in the pit of their stomach when they find out that a man that killed his family is allowed to walk free?

Doesn't anyone else feel like their not safe, in a country where you can get away with anything as long as your a star?

Its scary to walk down the street and think that someone could come and kill you, but that person might not have to pay for it.

Anyone else feel this way?

By the way, I am not interested in the idiots that think O.J. is innocent.
Eight answers:
2007-11-16 08:21:27 UTC
He should've been brought to the death chamber a long time ago.



Whoever gave me 4 thumbs down can suck it. O.J. supporters can eat my bunghole!
Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative
2007-11-16 16:55:38 UTC
Well, for the record, I can present you with a LOT more evidence that OJ DIDN'T kill Nicole and Ron than you can show me that he DID.

Innocent? No. Not at all. The overwhelming evidence points to his son having committed the crime, and that means OJ is guilty of aiding and abetting, since he knows about it.

Stop and look at the trial and replace OJ with his son as the suspect:



Defense: OJ couldn't have jumped that wall that the limo driver saw the black man running across the backyard went over.

Fact: His son, who is about the same height and build so could easily be mistaken for him, doesn't have rheumatoid arthritis and so could easily have vaulted that wall. After killing two people, who else would he run to? Dad.



Defense: The DNA is close but not an exact match.

Fact: His son would not be an exact match in DNA but would be close.



Defense: The murder weapon was never found, OJ doesn't have it. He went to Chicago on a plane and didn't have time to dispose of the knife.

Fact: Considering his son had been fired recently from a restaurant for threatening the manager with a knife... and then had been heard making a statement to some friends (after Nicole made his father stand in the back of an auditorium for their daughter's recital when he arrived late instead of allowing him to sit) that if anyone ever hurt his dad again he'd kill them... this guy had plenty of motive AND had the opportunity to dispose of the weapon since no one was watching him.



Defense: The gloves don't fit OJ

Fact: No one tried them on the kid, now, did they?





All of this notwithstanding... I think OJ is a creep. Why? Well, he definitely knows who did it and isn't interested in seeing justice done. Writing that book supports the evidence that his son did it. How? Well, simple. He can't be tried again for the crime but his son has no such protection. Someone wrote a book detailing the evidence against the son and soon after, OJ writes this book. Can you say "misdirection"? That is exactly what that was. His demeanour in this trial supports the evidence that his son did it, too... because he was a lot calmer during the murder trial than during this one. He's even said he trusts the jury system... and he knew he didn't do the murder... he knows he DID this.

So to come BACK to the question... there IS a double-murderer on the streets and he's not even being looked at as a suspect because they were SOOO sure it was OJ that they planted evidence to seal their case... and then blew it.
ding-a-ling
2007-11-16 17:42:30 UTC
Dont worry this guy may not go to jail but he will pay the ultimate price b4 he leaves this life.Now theres been some talk if he can a fair trial.My comment is "do you think a person who can commit a crime can get so much exposure in the media we just have to turn him loose because he cant get a fair hearing"? BUL SH*T !!We hear a lot about credible co defendants but i think they are more credible than O J.Also i think the defense lawyers are as sleazy as all of them.
Nefertiti
2007-11-16 17:26:05 UTC
Do you also get a weird feeling in your stomach about the many innocent people who have been unjustly incarcerated? The court system is not necessarily concerned with what is true, rather what can be proven. A guilty person can be proven innocent, and an innocent person can be proven guilty.
bigjon5555
2007-11-16 17:25:37 UTC
O.J.Simpson i believe he killed his wife.he got off because he was famous everyone knows that.an innocent man does;nt lead police down the highway for miles in an attempt to get away.if he were innocent he never would of ran.does;nt any body remember the letter he wrote saying he was sorry for all the trouble he caused.the judge in the case was;nt to smart he let a lot of things go that should of been seen by the public.and here he goes again causing trouble all over again in Las Vegas.i wonder if the judge this time is going to be smarter then the last judge was.this guy can;t stay out of trouble.he deserves to go to prison.and then he sits in court with that stupid look on his face.and wants everybody to thing that because he;s black their picking on me.he;s acting just like he did during his trail with nicole.
MoRmEx
2007-11-16 16:53:00 UTC
You all miss the point here, the guy whether he did it or not, got freed by a court of law, the verdict was not guilty.

he should be treated as such, not because he's a nice guy not because he's famous but because the jury found him not guilty.

so instead of blaming OJ (which i don't give a crap about anyways) you should channel all your blames to the juridical system.
Cris
2007-11-16 16:27:09 UTC
Yeah I agree with you - (and by the way I don't think he's innocent) but if you have money you can buy justice as unfortunate as that is. . .
rugga1
2007-11-16 16:25:57 UTC
some would say that's why Vigilantes were created but we'll have to wait and see ...it seems truth and justice have their own agenda for time and place


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...